Please see the below table to compare the maximum performance of each interface.
|External drive||Internal drive|
|USB 1.1||Up to 12 Mbits/sec||UltraATA 100||Up to 100 Mbytes/sec|
|USB 2.0||Up to 480 Mbits/sec||Serial ATA 1.5||Up to 1.5 Gbits/sec|
|USB 3.0||Up to 4.8 Gbits/sec||SATA 3.0||Up to 3.0 Gbits/sec|
|SATA 6.0||Up to 6.0 Gbits/sec|
|1394a (Firewire 400)||Up to 400 Mbits/sec|
|1394b (Firewire 800)||Up to 800 Mbits/sec||Serial-Attached SCSI (SAS)||Up to 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, or|
|eSATA||Up to 1.5 or 3.0 Gbits/sec|
|Thunderbolt||Up to 10 Gbits/sec|
Please note carefully not only the numbers, but also the units of measurement.
This table shows how much maximum total bandwidth is available per bus for each technology. Advertised transfer rates are based on the fastest speed at which the drive can send data back and forth across the cable (or bus) from the drive buffer.
Data transfer will go as fast as the slowest device or bus
As technology progresses and newer, faster interfaces are developed, a user can have a collection of devices of varying interfaces, whose top speeds can vary widely. The computer will move data during a given transfer as quickly as it can, taking into account the abilities of all the devices involved in the transfer:
It may be that the source disk is newer and can push data faster than the destination disk can write it.
Example: Backing up the data contained on a Serial ATA 6.0 drive to an external drive equipped with a USB 2.0 interface. The Serial ATA drive and interface are faster than USB 2.0, so the USB 2.0 drive and interface are the "bottleneck".
It may be that the destination disk and the interface can move and write data faster than the source disk can send it.
Example: Backing up the data contained on a Serial ATA 3.0 drive to an external drive equipped with a Thunderbolt interface. The Thunderbolt interface is faster than SATA 3.0, so the SATA 3.0 drive and interface are the "bottleneck".
Burst transfer rate vs. Sustained transfer rate
Many hard drive users mistake the "burst transfer rate" in the table above for what they can expect to see in real-world performance. This leads almost invariably to disappointment when their USB external hard drive does not transfer data at 50 MB/sec or their SATA internal drive at 300 MB/sec.
This is because no storage device will have all of this "potential" bandwidth available for data transfers. Some of the bandwidth will be shared with other devices on the bus and some will be consumed by commands and interface protocol overhead. Other limitations can include the transfer rate that is possible given the bus (ie, USB, SATA, Thunderbolt).
It is also worth noting that poor or slow drive performance is usually caused by a system configuration factor. It is very rare that poor performance is directly related to the drive. In many cases, perceived poor drive performance is usually attributed to the results of a benchmark test. Benchmark results are very system-dependent and the results can vary from system to system. For this reason, Seagate cannot provide a single sustained transfer rate specification for any drive.
Other Tips for Increasing Performance